
THE EMPHASIS at CJP is markedly different from what graduates encounter in PhD programs.
Those programs, after all, are known for work done in isolation, fierce competition and putting theory first â whereas CJP teaches peacebuilding as âa team activity,â said Professor Jayne Docherty. CJP approaches theory not as more import – ant than practice, but as a tool to inform and enrich creative and responsive practice. That means, Docherty said, that CJP students become âtheorizers, not theoristsâ who know that âno one person gets this work done.â
Even so, nearly 10 percent of CJP graduates have gone on to doctoral studies â for which Docherty has a theory: âWhen youâre a practitioner and you attend a theoretically grounded, practice-oriented program like ours, you go back to the field and identify questions that you have to answer, problems that you just feel compelled to figure out.â
More than 60 CJP graduates have earned or are pursuing PhDs in law, literature, theology, trauma studies, social work, political science, peace studies, security and intelligence, leadership and more, from some 40 institutions in Australia, Canada, India, Ireland, South Africa and beyond.
Among them are Jodi Dueck-Read MA â03 and Khadija O. Ali MA â01 .
âI LONGED FOR CJPâ

Jodi Dueck-Read earned a PhD in order to teach and research. Her doctorate, completed in 2016, is in peace and conflict studies from the Mauro Centre for Peace and Justice, St. Paulâs College, University of Manitoba.
In years prior to her doctoral studies, Dueck-Read not only attended CJP but also worked with Mennonite Central Committee in Chile and Bolivia, where she taught conflict transformation at the Bolivian Evangelical University. In the U.S., she was program coordinator for the Zuni Avenue Peace Center and worked in migration and peacebuilding.
Writing a dissertation â hers was titled âTransnational Activism: Peacebuilding and Intersectional Identities in the Border Justice Movementâ â can be âa long and lonely road,â she said. PhD programs offer limited opportunities to practice, and the emphasis on publishing and competition is a âdominant paradigm even in peace programs.â
While a doctoral student, âI longed for CJP,â she said, where âprofessors were encouraging and available.â Though her PhD programâs emphasis on writing and research did improve her skills, âCJPâs practical and lifelong connections are what peacebuilding is about.â
She now teaches conflict resolution studies at Menno Simons College in Winnipeg and is a senior research assistant for Canadian Financial Diaries.
HIGHER EDUCATION, EXPANDING FIELD
Before attending CJP, Khadija O. Ali was a civil society and womenâs rights activist, community worker, and participant in both national and international conferences addressing humanitarian needs, conflict resolution and reconciliation. She also founded the Somali NGO SAACID, with the mission to âhelp women, children and the poor achieve their full human potential.â
Her own potential prompted her to pursue more education, and in 2001 she earned a masterâs degree in conflict transformation from CJP. After graduating, Ali became a parliamentarian and minister of state in the transitional national government in Somalia. As she began âworking fully in peacebuilding and mediation efforts,â however, she realized that âthe Somali conflict was no longer local,â but regional and international.
A PhD was âthe logical next step,â she said. She finished her doctoral studies at George Mason University in 2014, writing a dissertation titled âThe Role of Hegemonies within African Regional Organizationsâ Interventions: A Comparative Study of Nigeria in ECOWASâ Intervention in Liberia and Ethiopia in IGADâs Intervention in Somalia.â
âBefore my PhD, I worked as a practitioner in community mobilization and mediation, and most of my focus was on grassroots activities,â she said. Now, she serves as an electoral commissioner for Somaliaâs National Independent Electoral Commission in Mogadishu.
âMy focus shifted to policy issues and looking at the bigger picture,â she said. âConflict requires macro-level analysis and interventions with policies that are appropriate at all levels.â